Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Riot Act: the Oscar Grant Riot Pool


Speaking of Oakland, Zombie is predicting major rioting in the wake of the coming Not Guilty verdicts in the Oscar Grant shooting trial. As there has already been major rioting in the wake of the shooting, this is not a Kreskin-like prediction, but if your vacation plans include the Fruitvale area of Oakland, you might want to plan accordingly: Forecast: Category 5 Riot Expected to Hit Oakland Soon

Nearly everyone in the Bay Area agrees that a major Oakland riot is brewing if the verdict in the trial of policeman Johannes Mehserle, accused of murdering BART passenger Oscar Grant on New Year’s Day, 2009, comes back anything other than “GUILTY!” The problem for Oakland’s sense of security is that Mehserle is almost certainly notguilty of murder, and the jury is likely to give him a comparatively light sentence or even let him go completely.

The case has received wall-to-wall coverage in California for the last 18 months, but here’s a quick primer for those of you elsewhere in the country who may be unfamiliar with it:

In the early hours of January 1, 2009, a large group of young men got into a brawl on BART, the Bay Area’s subway system. Police were summoned and stopped the train at Oakland’s Fruitvale station, where a chaotic mass-arrest scene spilled onto the platform. As hundreds of passengers watched — many of whom were filming the proceedings with their cell-phone video cameras — several harassed BART police officers tried to subdue and then arrest dozens of brawlers. In the midst of the melee, one of the cops (Johannes Mehserle) pulled out a pistol and shot one of the men being arrested (Oscar Grant), killing him.

Sounds bad, right? Not so fast. As revealed in some of the videos taken of the incident, Mehserle was absolutely flabbergasted to see a gun when he looked down at his hand, because he had been instead reaching for his taser, which is also gun-shaped and kept in a belt-level holster. As several witnesses, including a weeping Mehserle himself, testified at the trial, the shooting was entirely accidental, and Mehserle was instead trying to tase Grant, whom he felt was out of control and resisting arrest.

This is as much a reason why I am not liberal as anything else. Can we all agree that rioting in the streets over a verdict you don't like is not the way to go? Then there's the inevitable "martyrdom" of Oscar Grant whom, we are told ad nauseum, was "going to college" and "turning his life around"... and was also part of a drunken scene at the Fruitvale BART station on New Year's Eve; the place you go to look for trouble, not avoid it. Also, Grant was clearly resisting arrest, which we should all know by now is not a wise career move.

Mostly, though, we have an anti-government mob whipped into a frenzy by shadowy "organizers" acting out yet another hate-filled racial drama. Hey, sounds like a Tea Party's breaking out!

Look, Mehserle killed a man, probably because he thought his gun was a taser. That would probably get you a few years for negligent homicide. But, murder? Only if you are a liberal.



1 comment:

  1. Wow, interesting take on liberal versus conservative. I of course am a lefty-commie-pinko-ultra-liberal, and I think the man is innocent as hell. To boot, I think anyone who uses this as an excuse to riot and destroy property, be it personal or government, should see serious time behind bars and be subject to whatever the riot police deem necessary to keep the peace. I happen to be a teacher in West Oakland (Non-traditional) and I had a very frank discussion with my students today about what is acceptable behavior in this situation, Here's the Cliff's notes: Peacefully protesting what you deem to be social injustice (whether I agree or not)= your right, breaking stuff and stealing because something you didn't like happened- very, very bad. Before you go on and on about soft liberals, perhaps you could drop your generalizations and, gasp, ask one or two what they think.

    ReplyDelete